As a field engineer at Xilinx, I often ask myself: Can we provide a DSP core that meets all of our customers' unique design requirements? Sometimes the kernel is too large, too small, or not fast enough. At times, we develop a core that precisely fits our customers' needs and quickly launches under the COREGeneratorâ„¢ trademark. However, even in such cases, customers still desire a specific set of DSP functions, and there's no time to delay. In these situations, I often recommend using the interpolation lookup table (LUT) available on our devices to customize their DSP capabilities.
A lookup table (LUT) is essentially a storage element that "finds" the output based on any given combination of input states, ensuring that each input has an exact output. Using LUTs to implement DSP functions offers several significant advantages:
- You can change the LUT content using high-level programming languages like MATLAB® or Simulink®.
- You can design a DSP function to perform mathematical operations that are challenging with discrete logic, such as y=log(x), y=exp(x), y=1/x, y=sin(x), etc.
- The LUT can also handle complex mathematical functions that might require excessive FPGA resources if implemented through configurable logic blocks (CLBs), embedded multipliers, or DSP48 units.
However, using LUTs in this way comes with some drawbacks. When implementing DSP functions with LUTs, you must use block RAM (BRAM) components. For example, executing the function y=sqrt(x) (where x is a 16-bit input and y is an 18-bit output) would require approximately 64 18KB BRAM cells for each variable. If your goal is to implement a miniaturized Spartan® device or if you have too many operations to perform and cannot spare 64 BRAM cells for each variable, we recommend avoiding this method due to its high resource cost.
The interpolated LUT method combines the benefits of traditional LUT implementation with significantly reduced BRAM usage. This approach allows linear interpolation from a smaller LUT (e.g., a 1000-word LUT) to simulate a larger one, achieving higher numerical resolution than the original LUT. With this method, only one BRAM, one embedded multiplier (or DSP48 unit), and a few CLB chips are needed to implement the control logic, making the cost more rational. Additionally, from a signal-to-noise ratio perspective, the numerical accuracy is quite satisfactory.
Applying the interpolation LUT (ILUT) method requires some skill. For instance, when used to execute the y=sqrt(x) function, the ILUT's performance in terms of area occupancy, timing, and numerical precision becomes evident. Let's look at this example first, then I'll explain how to apply this method to meet different customer needs, such as linearizing sensors with non-linear transfer functions or implementing adaptive finite impulse response (FIR) filters to eliminate speckle noise in Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images.
Designing with System Generator for DSP
To implement the DPS algorithm on Xilinx FPGAs, I used System Generator for DSP design and synthesis tools based on MathWorks Simulink's model-based design methodology. System Generator benefits from Xilinx's DSP blockset within the Simulink environment, which automatically calls COREGenerator to generate highly optimized netlists for DSP building blocks. While Simulink is a double-precision floating-point design tool, System Generator is a fixed-point computing tool. Together, these tools allow defining the total number of bits per signal and the binary position of each signal, enabling efficient handling of fixed-point operations. The simulation results are accurate and bit-true, allowing easy comparison with MATLAB scripts or floating-point reference values generated by Simulink blocks to check for quantization errors.
Figure 1 shows the top-level structure of the ILUT scheme in System Generator. To make this method as general as possible, assume that the input variable x in nx=16 bits has a value range of 0≤x<1, so its format is “unsigned 16 bits plus 16 bits to the right of the binary point.†It is called Ufix_16_16 format. The most significant bit (MSB) and least significant bit (LSB) modules correspond to the highest bit of the input data nb=10 and the lowest bit of nx-nb=6, respectively. These signals are named x0 and dx. The y=sqrt(x) output is represented by a ny=17-bit binary number in the format: Ufix_17_17.
Figure 2 shows the deployment steps for a 1000-word small-capacity LUT through a dual-port RAM module. Since the module is read-only memory, the Boolean constant module We_const forces the write to zero. Signals X0 and X0+1 are used as the next two addresses on the ROM table. The zero constant of the Data_const module defines the size of any ROM word (i.e., ny in this example).
The following formula shows how to insert a point with coordinates (x, y) between two known points (x0, y0) and (x1, y1) with x0 being the most significant bit of x:
Note that X1 and X0 are adjacent addresses of this small-capacity LUT with only one least significant bit separated. Since the address space of this small-capacity LUT is the nb bit, the value of the LSB is 2^-nb.
The interpolation step is shown in Figure 3. The "Reinterpret" module can change the dx=x-x0 signal without changing the binary representation. It resets the binary point (from UFix_6_0 to UFix_6_6 format) and outputs a fraction of the nx-nb bit binary number to calculate the value of (x-x0)/2^-nb.
From a hardware perspective, these modules are not occupied. In general (and depending on the type of function we apply through the ILUT method), if y1=0 and y0=0, we can force y1-y0=1 so that we can get 1/2^-nb instead of 0. We use the Mux, RaTIonal, Constant, and Constant1 modules to perform this work. The remaining Mult, Add, and Sub modules perform linear interpolation formulas. In this example, I force the output signal of the Mult module to be 17-bit resolution instead of the theoretically required 23 bits, because the overall numerical accuracy is sufficient for this test. In addition, since the y-sqrt(x) function is monotonically increasing, all results are unsigned. In other words, different functions require different fine-tuning of the data types, but they are not far from the principle shown in Figure 3.
Suppose we target the Spartan-3E 1200 (fg320-4) and now use the ISE Design Suite and System Generator for DSP 10.1 SP3 tools to lay out and route it. The overall FPGA resources are as follows:
The design is fully pipelined and can provide new outputs in any one clock cycle. The delay is 10 clock cycles and the maximum data rate is 194.70MSPS (million samples per second). In terms of numerical accuracy, for a 1000 or 2000 word ILUT, the ratio between the reference floating point result and the quantization error of the System Generator for DSP fixed point output, i.e., the signal to noise ratio is 71.94 dB or 77.95 dB, respectively.
In addition to ILUT, we can also use the CORDIC SQRT module in the Reference MathBlockset provided by Xilinx System Generator for DSP. In this example, the total delay is 37 clock cycles, the maximum data rate is 115.18MSPS, the area resource occupancy is 940 flip-flops, a total of 885 four-input LUTs, 560 occupied chips, and two MULT18x18 embedded multiplications. Device. The signal to noise ratio is 40.64 dB. These results show that CORDIC is an ideal way to implement fixed-point math, but ILUT is better in many ways.
Aroma Series
The Aroma King Disposable vaping pod is a single standalone unit. Ready to go straight out of the box with a 550mAh battery already installed. These disposables yield a high capacity of 600 or 700+ puffs. No button to press. Simply inhale and enjoy the rich, full-flavoured vape. Available in two strengths, 10mg and 20mg or without nicotine!
Aroma King is a relatively new vape brand founded in 2019. It`s most recognised for its Disposable Vape devices and brings new and fun flavours to the disposable vape market.
As more adults look to discover what disposable vapes have to offer, Aroma King is one of the brands that present them with great taste and practical devices that are easy to use and affordable. The Aroma King Disposable Vape is the most popular of the Aroma King`s vape range, and looking at its features and performance, it`s easy to see why
Â
aroma king 600,aroma king 7000,aroma king vape,aroma king poland,aroma king disposable.
Shenzhen Ousida Technology Co., Ltd , https://en.osdvape.com