Now that cloud computing is generally dying, it is beginning to go to the road of death. There is no new breakthrough point, but now we are ushered in the era of serverlessness, also known as "function as a service", and the potential for serverlessness. Can he assume the next phase of cloud computing development?
Nick Rockwell, CTO of the New York Times, said that as cloud computing brings more flexibility to the enterprise, event-triggered computing costs are reduced and application development More efficient. We are also ushered in the era of serverless.
Cloud computing is a boon for many companies, enabling CIOs to shut down servers and even shut down data centers. CIOs can lease processing power, storage and other tools from different vendors in a fast-growing market. But a small number of IT executives are looking for a more efficient way to rent computing power. They did not undertake the routine and heavy cloud architecture design and management work, but chose "serverless."
In the absence of server computing, cloud instances are no longer allocated but are only idle unless they are required to process applications and other functions. That is, resources are only provided when certain events occur. A textbook-like example of event-based computing is the Internet of Things (IoT), in which sensor-based devices react to busy triggering events. When a user accesses a mobile application from his or her smartphone, it is an event that the cloud's virtual machine will retrieve and provide information.
Nick Rockwell, CTO of the New York Times, believes that serverless, also known as "Function as a Service" (FaaS), represents the next phase of cloud computing, enabling developers to focus on Write code without worrying about the server you are running. “No server makes the product both reliable and scalable,†Rockwell told CIO.com. “In the long run and from an economic perspective, this will be a better, cheaper and more efficient way.â€
Use one, or two, or three cloud platforms simultaneouslyIt is a forward-thinking idea that Rockwell is moving the New York Times to traditional cloud services. When Rockwell left Conde Nast to join the New York Times in 2015, the New York Times was connecting its computing infrastructure to the virtual private cloud of Amazon Web Services, enabling businesses to bring their data centers Connect to a virtual private cloud within Amazon Web Services. The New York Times lacks a complete Content Delivery Network (CDN) to "store" content to "close" to consumers' computing devices.
Today, the New York Times business is spread across two cloud platforms: Amazon Web Services (AWS) runs most of the Enterprise Applications and e-commerce platforms of the New York Times, while Google Cloud Platform (GCP) supports consumer-oriented Applications include NYTImes.com, the New York Times Mobile App and the New York Times Crossword. The New York Times also uses the Content Delivery Network (CDN) cloud service provided by Fastly to ensure that consumers can access the New York Times website and applications by keeping updated copies of these services to avoid system disruptions. influences.
Cloud migration has brought benefits, but management is still a chore. Rockwell's infrastructure team must also figure out how many Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google Cloud Platform (GCP) instances they need, how large these instances should be, and whether the instances require additional input, output, or memory. Then they need to configure each instance and patch and install the software on the operating system. In addition, they must carefully manage the dependencies associated with each application and figure out how each part of the application is extended.
Rockwell said: "The use and optimization of resources are falling on customers." This also confirms the lament of many CIOs over the years. "If we rent 50 instances, if one is working at full load and the other 49 are idle, that is our own problem."
Serverless potentialAs a result, Rockwell's growing interest in serverlessness raises the issue of idle instances. Unlike a specially crafted code that executes a triggered function when a predefined event occurs, this event is performed by a serverless platform. The customer does not need to tell the cloud provider how many times these functions will be triggered, but they will pay each time a function is executed.
Rockwell says that serverlessness can result in a 5 to 10x efficiency increase even with the waste caused by idle cloud instances. Rockwell said: "Because of the healthy competitive situation, the large amount of resources saved by these efficiency improvements will be returned to users."
Whether serverlessness will become the next big thing in the computing field remains to be seen. According to Gartner, more than 90% of serverless deployments are outside the infrastructure and operations teams of the IT department. Vendors are looking to capitalize on the brand benefits of companies such as The New York Times and General Electric, and General Electric's CTO Chris Drumgoole also expressed his enthusiasm for the serverless model.
In 2014, Amazon Web Services launched AWS Lamba as its first commercial serverless platform. Introducing products similar to Microsoft and Google, which should promote market competition and bring more choices to customers. Rockwell is currently using the serverless mode in the Google App Engine to run the New York Times crossword puzzle and other applications, and he plans to run more in this way over time. s application.
Instead of focusing entirely on a serverless platform, Rockwell tends to leverage Google's engineering expertise, plus its container management capabilities and platform-as-a-service (PaaS) offerings.
Most cloud platform software is agnostic, and these platforms allow developers to decide how to properly design and solve problems. But Google's approach is "stubborn". Basically, you can choose an architectural design such as a programming language and stick to it. In addition, Rockwell said that Google is working hard to build a product ecosystem that is designed to work together and has its own stubbornness. While developers tend to have more choices, fewer choices actually help minimize the cost of planning, designing, and building the architecture from the very beginning.
Rockwell said: "Google now has the best serverless case. By working with Google, we have made a little progress in leading technology, and so far, everything has progressed very well."
The 1080P high-definition projectors on the market can be roughly divided into three grades: high, medium, and low. The low-end products are mainly aimed at the entry-level market. In terms of performance, they can fully meet the needs of watching various HD videos. In terms of adjustment, it tends to be simpler, mainly to allow entry-level users to quickly set up the projector, but the contrast of such projectors is generally not very high, and the overall picture effect is relatively general; mid-range projectors mainly have certain projector knowledge. , the projection picture also has a better performance, the most important contrast of the cinema projector has also been greatly improved, the projector adjustment tends to be more professional, and it is also equipped with various additional functions to improve the projection effect; high-end products are Mainly aimed at enthusiast players, both price and performance are the symbol of flagship. For commercial use, in addition to satisfying home entertainment applications, 1080P high-definition standard projectors can also support clear and delicate text and table content projection for business office applications that often conduct office text, PPT presentations, and video presentations. .
4k meeting room projector,video projector for meeting room,conference room led projector,lcd meeting room projector,business 1080p HD projector
Shenzhen Happybate Trading Co.,LTD , https://www.szhappybateprojectors.com